The tip of the climate spending iceberg

icebergLockheed Martin, a recent Washington Post article notes, is getting into renewable energy, nuclear fusion, “sustainability” and even fish farming projects, to augment its reduced defense profits. The company plans to forge new ties with Defense Department and other Obama initiatives, based on a shared belief in manmade climate change as a critical security and planetary threat. It is charging ahead where other defense contractors have failed, confident that its expertise, lobbying skills and “socially responsible” commitment to preventing climate chaos will land it plentiful contracts and subsidies.

As with its polar counterparts, 90% of the titanic climate funding iceberg is invisible to most citizens, businessmen and politicians. The Lockheed action is the mere tip of the icy mountaintop.

The multi-billion-dollar agenda reflects the Obama Administration’s commitment to using climate change to radically transform America. It reflects a determination to make the climate crisis industry so enormous that no one will be able to tear it down, even as computer models and disaster claims become less and less credible – and even if Republicans control Congress and the White House after 2016. Lockheed is merely the latest in a long list of regulators, researchers, universities, businesses, manufacturers, pressure groups, journalists and politicians with such strong monetary, reputational and authority interests in alarmism that they will defend its tenets and largesse tooth and nail.

Above all, it reflects a conviction that alarmists have a right to control our energy use, lives, livelihoods and living standards, with no transparency and no accountability for mistakes they make or damage they inflict on disfavored industries and families. And they are pursuing this agenda despite global warming again being dead last in the latest Gallup poll of 15 issues of greatest concern to Americans: only 25% say they worry about it “a great deal,” despite steady hysteria; 24% are “not at all” worried about the climate. By comparison, 46% percent worry a great deal about the size and power of the federal government.   

But Climate Crisis, Inc. is using our tax and consumer dollars to advance six simultaneous strategies.

1) Climate research. The US government spends $2.5 billion per year on research that focuses on carbon dioxide, ignores powerful natural forces that have always driven climate change, and generates numerous reports and press releases warning of record high temperatures, melting icecaps, rising seas, stronger storms, more droughts and other “unprecedented” crises. The claims are erroneous and deceitful.

They are consistently contradicted by actual climate and weather records, and so alarmists increasingly emphasize computer models that reinvent and substitute for reality. Penn State modeler Michael Mann has collected millions for headline-grabbing work like his latest assertion that the Gulf Stream is slowing – contrary to 20 years of actual measurements that show no change. Former NASA astronomer James Hansen received a questionable $250,000 Heinz Award from Secretary of State John Kerry’s wife, for his climate crisis and anti-coal advocacy. Al Gore and 350.org also rake in millions. Alarmist scientists and institutions seek billions more, while virtually no government money goes to research into natural forces.

2) Renewable energy research and implementation grants, loans, subsidies and mandates drive projects to replace hydrocarbons that are still abundant and still 82% of all US energy consumed. Many recipients went bankrupt despite huge taxpayer grants and loan guarantees. Wind turbine installations butcher millions of birds and bats annually, but are exempt from Endangered Species Act fines and penalties.

Tesla Motors received $256 million to produce electric cars for wealthy elites who receive $2,500 to $7,500 in tax credits, plus free charging and express lane access. From 2007 to 2013, corn ethanol interests spent $158 million lobbying for more “green” mandates and subsidies – and $6 million in campaign contributions – for a fuel that reduces mileage, damages engines, requires enormous amounts of land, water and fertilizer, and from stalk to tailpipe emits more carbon dioxide than gasoline. General Electric spends tens of millions lobbying for more taxpayer renewable energy dollars; so do many other companies. The payoffs add up to tens of billions of dollars, from taxpayers and consumers.

3) Regulatory fiats increasingly substitute for laws and carbon taxes that Congress refuses to enact, due to concerns about economic and employment impacts, and because China, India and other countries’ CO2 emissions dwarf America’s. EPA’s war on coal has already claimed thousands of jobs, raised electricity costs for millions of businesses and families, and adversely affected living standards, health and welfare for millions of families. The White House and EPA are also targeting oil and gas drilling and fracking.

Now the Obama Administration is unleashing a host of new mandates and standards, based on arbitrary “social cost of carbon” calculations that assume fossil fuel use imposes numerous climate and other costs, but brings minimal or no economic or societal benefits. The rules will require onerous new energy efficiency and CO2 emission reduction standards that will send consumer costs skyrocketing, while channeling billions of dollars to retailers, installers, banks and mostly overseas manufacturers.

As analyst Roger Bezdek explains, water heaters that now cost $675-1,500 will soon cost $1,200-2,450 – with newfangled exhaust fans, vent pipes and condensate removal systems. Pickup trucks with more fuel efficiency and less power will nearly double in price. Microwaves, cell phones, vacuum cleaners, hair dryers, toasters, coffee pots, lawn mowers, photocopiers, televisions and almost everything else will cost far more. Poor and middle class families will get clobbered, to prevent perhaps 5% of the USA’s 15% of all human CO2 emissions toward 0.04% of atmospheric CO2, and maybe 0.00001 degrees of warming.

4) A new UN climate treaty would limit fossil fuel use by developed countries, place no binding limits or timetables on developing nations, and redistribute hundreds of billions of dollars to poor countries that claim they have been harmed by emissions and warming due to rich country hydrocarbon use. Even IPCC officials now openly brag that climate policy has “almost nothing” to do with protecting the environment – and everything to do with intentionally transforming the global economy and redistributing its wealth.

5) Vicious personal attacks continue on scientists, businessmen, politicians and others who disagree publicly with the catechism of climate cataclysm. Alarmist pressure groups and Democrat members of Congress are out to destroy the studies, funding, reputations and careers of all who dare challenge climate disaster tautologies. At President Obama’s behest, even disaster aid agencies are piling on.

New FEMA rules require that any state seeking disaster preparedness funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency must first assess how climate change threatens their communities. This will mean relying on discredited, worthless alarmist models that routinely spew out predictions unrelated to reality. It likely means no federal funds will go to states that include or focus on natural causes, historical records or models that have better track records than those employed by the IPCC, EPA and President.  

6) Thought control. In addition to vilifying climate chaos skeptics, alarmists are determined to control all thinking on the subject. They are terrified that people will find realist analyses and explanations far more persuasive. They refuse to debate skeptics, respond to NIPCC and other studies examining natural climate change and carbon dioxide benefits to wildlife and agriculture, or even admit there is no consensus.

They want the news media to ignore us but cannot put the internet genie back in the bottle. The White House is trying, though. It even sent picketers to FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s home, to demand that he knuckle under and apply 1930s’ telephone laws to the internet, as a first step in content control

States must refuse to play the climate crisis game. Through lawsuits, hearings, investigations and other actions, governors, legislators, AGs and other officials can delay EPA diktats, educate citizens about solar and other natural forces, and explain the huge costs and trifling benefits of these draconian regulations.

Congress should hold hearings, demand an accounting of agency expenditures, require solid evidence for every climate claim and regulation, and cross-examine Administration officials on details. It should slash EPA and other agency budgets, so they cannot keep giving billions to pressure groups, propagandists and attack dogs. Honesty, transparency, accountability and a much shorter leash are long overdue.

Paul Driessen is senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org),  author of Eco-Imperialism: Green power – Black death, and coauthor of Cracking Big Green: Saving the world from the Save-the-Earth money machine.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (13)

  • Avatar

    GR82DRV

    |

    Look at the six strategies listed here and consider all the derivatives – Again, it reads like the 150-year world Marxist wish list – all the things they could never achieve by honestly stating their objectives to the public.

    An ice berg is exactly what they need.

    I also agree that one objective is to build such a critical mass of (ice berg) fraud that it can never be thawed by the light of day.

  • Avatar

    Al Shelton

    |

    An excellent article.
    I sent it to the Government of Canada’s Prime Minister; the Environment Minister among others.
    Thanks.

  • Avatar

    Gator

    |

    Lockheed Martin is just reading the Stalinist writing on the bullet ridden wall. Threats and grants.

    Firearm manufacturers and gun shops are losing access to loans because the Fascist in Chief wants us disarmed. Any business that does not fall in line with the tyrant, risks losing everything.

    LM knows that by kissing the one ring that rules them all, they will have unlimited access to taxpayer money, and can continue BAU without fear of brown shirt government backed ‘grassroot’ attacks on their fossil fuel driven industry.

    The time for change has past, it is time for revolution, time for states to reclaim their sovereignty and throw off the chains of federal tyranny.

  • Avatar

    Tab Numlock

    |

    Don’t forget the relentless brainwashing of kids in school. No wonder they have no time to learn anything useful.

  • Avatar

    richard

    |

    Like good old communism this only works until the money runs out. its a shame that billions will go to waste until the penny finally drops.

    • Avatar

      Gator

      |

      Don’t be silly! How can a government run out of money, when they can just print more? :-*

  • Avatar

    chili palmer

    |

    Mr. Driessen provides a great service with one sad exception. Only two people can stop the fraud, Boehner and McConnell, and they have no intention of doing so. They’ve had daily access to microphones for 2 and 3 decades, are perfectly aware it’s a fraud, and don’t care. The point is, it’s by no means an Obama invention. Mr. Driessen says, “The multi-billion-dollar agenda reflects the Obama Administration’s commitment to using climate change to radically transform America.” It would be more accurate to substitute the name Pres. George HW Bush for Obama in this sentence. It was Bush’s 1990 USGCRP that embedded climate spending in the Executive branch and launched the climate science spending boom of today. Per article, 3/6/15, “Causes and consequences of the climate science boom,” William Butos and Thomas McQuade. A “critical step” in the spending boom was “passage of the Global Change Research Act of 1990.” 11/16/1990, U.S. Global Change Research Act of 1990

    • Avatar

      JayPee

      |

      This is what’s wrong with most USA republicans : The little testicular fortitude they do have is mostly geared toward re-election and being inoffensive. In other words : Being a moderate or RINO.

      The only thing good to be said of them is that they are not INTENTIONALLY trying to destroy the USA as opposed to the demorats.

  • Avatar

    Luc Ozade

    |

    Thanks for publishing this excellent article, Paul. It really is a massive hill we have to climb to dismantle all the structures that the Alarmists have been allowed to fabricate. All any of us can do is to keep chipping away at them and trust that change will eventually come about via the ballot box.

    I shall be sending a copy of this article to my MP, who is hoping to get re-elected at the forthcoming UK general election.

  • Avatar

    Mark Svoboda

    |

    But God is able to tear it down. Anytime man builds the tower of Babel God will destroy it. Is climate change a tower of Babel?

    • Avatar

      Gator

      |

      No, The trillion dollar Climate Change Industry is a bloodsucking leach on humanity, it just needs to be squashed.

      Defund it.

  • Avatar

    Mervyn

    |

    The renewable energy industry is simply not viable, which is why it survives on the support of taxpayers’ funds… and it will always have to rely on taxpayers’ funds for survival.

    This vicious cycle will break, however, when governments have to enforce budgetary controls. To pay for vital services when times are tough, governments will have no alternative but to water down the handouts in all shapes and forms that are given out in order to prop up the renewable energy industry.

    We see this in Australia right now, where the government does not take kindly to non-viable taxpayer funded projects like the inefficient and costly renewable energy industry.

Comments are closed

No Trackbacks.