The Next Climategate?

congressThe federal government’s chief climate research agency is refusing to give House Republicans the detailed information they want on a controversial study on climate change. Citing confidentiality concerns and the integrity of the scientific process, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said it won’t give Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) the research documents he subpoenaed. At the center of the controversy is a study that concluded there has not been a 15-year “pause” in global warming. Some NOAA scientists contributed to the report. Timothy Cama, The Hill 28 October 2015

Worried about climate fraud, Congress is investigating a federal agency for allegedly manipulating weather data to show recent global warming when there is none. So why is the agency refusing to cooperate? Taxpayers pay for this research, which is being used to justify massive new federal spending and regulation. They deserve to know what NOAA and other federal agencies are doing — and whether they’re being honest or serving an unspoken extreme political agenda. –Editorial, Investor’s Business Daily, 28 October 2015

It sounds like Climategate all over again, with climate scientists trying to cover up, obfuscate and frustrate all attempts by outsiders to get at the truth. What gives them the right to decide they are above the law? As a publically funded operation, why do they think they are entitled to pick and choose what information they release to Congress? And above all, what are they trying to hide? –Paul Homewood, Not A Lot Of People Know That, 28 October 2015

The global warming debate on Capitol Hill is heating up. Government scientists refused to comply with lawmakers’ demands they turn over internal documents regarding a study that eliminated the “hiatus” in global warming from the temperature record. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officials argued such records are confidential and “essential to frank discourse among scientists.” The science agency said it has a history of protecting the “confidentiality of deliberative scientific discussions.” NOAA’s decision not to comply with a subpoena from House science committee lawmakers has only angered Chairman Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican, who says Americans have a right to know what taxpayer-funded scientists were thinking when they altered the temperature record in June. –Michael Bastasch, Daily Caller News Foundation, 28 October 2015

NOAA needs to come clean about why they altered the data to get the results they needed to advance this administration’s extreme climate change agenda. Congress cannot do its job when agencies openly defy Congress and refuse to turn over information. When an agency decides to alter the way it has analyzed historical temperature data for the past few decades, it’s crucial to understand on what basis those decisions were made. This action has broad national and policy implications. –Committee Chairman Rep. Lamar Smith, The Christian Science Monitor, 28 October 2015

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (4)

  • Avatar

    GR82DRV

    |

    This is a symptom of the new leftist attitude from the White House on down – they believe they are immune to the law. Not only do they feel immune, they now feel emboldened to flip their middle digits and flash the moon at citizen taxpayers who demand legal and Constitutional accountability.

    When the mainstream media [u]applauds[/u] leftist politicians and candidates for how “artfully” they can lie to the public, even while under sworn testimony, we know we’ve turned a bad corner.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    Sounds like some people at NOAA should be spending more time with their families while pursuing new career opportunities .
    Taxes payers have a right through their elected representatives or otherwise to ask and promptly receive information about temperature reading methods used to develop billion dollar policies .

    The request was not a national security issue .

    These stonewallers need to go and figure out who they work for . If they are found to have fudged the data and stonewalled to cover it up then charges of fraud need to be filed .

    If they have nothing to hide turn over the Emails and all calculations ,assumptions and proof of their work .

    Integrity of the scientific process… now that really is a joke coming from the climate silencers camp .

    Reply

  • Avatar

    TB

    |

    NOAA should be defunded if they cannot comply with an oversight committee’s request. Climategate? I think it goes much, much deeper than just “fudging” some data.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    John from Michigan

    |

    It’s simple. Find the leaders of NOAA in contempt of Congress and throw them in jail until the data (which is probably being destroyed even as you read this) is turned over to Congress. Of the data is destroyed, leave them there forever.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Loading Disqus Comments ...

No Trackbacks.