The Green Witch Hunt

eric schneidermanLed by agenda-setting New York State and radical left-winger Al Gore the progressive persecution of climate change skeptics by the states is underway.

Top law enforcement officers in several states are joining with the Chicken Littles of green activism to weaponize the scientifically dubious argument that human activity is not only changing the earth’s climate but that unprecedented world catastrophe awaits unless draconian, economy-killing carbon emission controls are imposed more or less immediately.

The litigation offensive has nothing to do with justice. It is aimed at forcing those few remaining holdouts in the business community who stubbornly cling to science to confess their thought crimes and submit to the know-nothing Left’s climate superstitions. It is part of modern-day environmentalism’s ongoing assault on knowledge, human progress, markets, and the rule of law.

Repent and embrace the true green faith or else you’ll be investigated and denounced as a climate criminal, is the message of “Inspector Gotcha,” New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman.

“It’s too early to say what we’re going to find,” he said of the five-month-old witch hunt aimed at his current target, the gigantic ExxonMobil, at a press conference this week in Lower Manhattan. “We intend to work as aggressively as possible, but also as carefully as possible.”

The New York Times previously reported that Schneiderman is looking into “whether the company lied to the public about the risks of climate change or to investors about how such risks might hurt the oil business. … For several years, advocacy groups with expertise in financial analysis have been warning that fossil fuel companies might be overvalued in the stock market, since the need to limit climate change might require that much of their coal, oil and natural gas be left in the ground.”

But “The First Amendment, ladies and gentlemen, does not give you the right to commit fraud,” Schneiderman said this week.

Of course that assertion is true on its face but that doesn’t necessarily mean whatever he’s calling fraud is actually fraud. How can rejecting a theory — a wild, unproven, apocalyptic theory based on creative computer modeling and little else — about future climate conditions constitute fraud?

Read rest…

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    JayPee

    |

    Since HAIR SCHNYTER MAHN

    is so determined to keep fraud out of free speech,

    Why isn’t he investigating and trying to indict the pig he shares the stage with :

    AL GORE ?!

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Mjw

    |

    Remincent of the Soviet Union show trials of the 30’s.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Aido

    |

    I’m not an American, but when EPA’s Ruckleshaus says DDT is a carcinogen and his successors say CO2 is a pollutant, I can believe almost anything of the Americans when they get religious fervour.

    Reply

Leave a comment

Loading Disqus Comments ...

No Trackbacks.