The £300 Billion Climate Change Act is Costing Britain the Earth

British parliament

British taxpayers will be forced to squander more than £300 billion over the next 15 years on pointless climate change schemes – more than double the cost of HS2, the Heathrow airport extension, and Hinkley Point C combined.

This is the massive public spending scandal exposed in a report for the Global Warming Policy Foundation by MP Peter Lilley. It’s all thanks to the 2008 Climate Change Act which has committed Britain to the ludicrous goal of reducing its carbon dioxide emissions by 57 per cent by 2030.

Lilley was only one of a handful of MPs to vote against the Act which was largely written by an activist from the hard-left environment campaign group Friends of the Earth (Bryony – now Baroness Worthington),  introduced under the last Labour government by the then Energy and Climate Change Secretary Ed Miliband – and enthusiastically supported by the then Opposition leader David Cameron who was warming up to lead the “greenest government ever”.

Astonishingly, as Lilley details in the report, no one at a senior level in government since has ever submitted the Climate Change Act to any kind of cost benefit analysis, let alone thought to question whether Britain’s handicapping its economy in this way will make the blindest bit of difference to climate change.

As former Cabinet Secretary Lord Turnbull points out in his introduction to Lilley’s report, much has changed since the Climate Change Act was passed:

• Temperatures have risen but below the range of most climate change models.

• Many of the predictions about the harmful effects of climate change have been exaggerated.

• Fossil fuel prices which were expected to continue rising to the point where renewables reached ‘grid parity’ have fallen under the impact of new extraction technologies, thereby raising the costs of the subsidies required.

• No other country has followed us down the extreme unilateralist path.

• Severe damage is being done to our energy-intensive industries, most recently steel.

• Two of the technologies essential to achieve the carbon dioxide target at reasonable cost are struggling (nuclear power) or research has been abandoned, as in the case of carbon capture and storage.

Yet Britain remains legally bound by this exercise in green virtue-signalling passed all but unanimously by a House of Commons either too lazy, ill-informed or ideologically blinkered to appreciate just what damage it would be doing to Britain’s people, landscape and economy.

Read rest…

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (6)

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    Part of the problem these days is governments have a credit card with no limit and almost no accountability . Tax payers for the most part are in the dark about $$ Billions of wasted spending and the climate con game is the poster boy /girl .
    $300 billion pounds would build thousands of schools and hospitals schools .
    Instead, other than a few lobby group payoffs, tax payers are getting royally ripped off .
    The politicians that approved those payments have breaching their fiduciary duty to the citizens and should be subject to a class action to recover the expenses ( as in the case of theft ) , be fired for failing in their duty and jailed for facilitating a scam .
    People have been put away for a fraction of the cost of this appalling fraud .

    • Avatar

      JayPee

      |

      Righto Amber !

      Even more astonishing is that no form of paper is money.
      No form of paper is a stable store of value.
      All debt is nothing but a bookkeeping entry.

      The most bold move Trump an make ?
      The Greatest move he can make defining his presidency ?

      CANCEL THE NATIONAL DEBT !

      It doesn’t exist anyway because it is nothing but an accounting summation at the end of the fiscal period fudged to look like the books balance and they don’t.

      CANCEL THE NATIONAL DEBT !

      • Avatar

        JayPee

        |

        Also

        The Federal Reserve and ALL policy decision makers at the Federal Reserve probably qualify for criminal prosecution under the

        Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Law !

        • Avatar

          JayPee

          |

          Are you saying that Trump lacks authority to declare the national debt void ?
          Even if it’s true. so what ?
          It is certain that Lincoln lacked authority to issue the Emancipation Proclamation.
          Who won ?

  • Avatar

    Simon Ruszczak

    |

    I remember the day the bill passed, on 28 October 2008, it snowed in London, WTF . Tossers run my country.

Comments are closed

No Trackbacks.