Shock Freeze A Harbinger Of Things To Come? The Many Signs Of More Cooling!

As Europe and USA brace for more frigid weather, some are asking if this is what we need to expect to cope with in the future.

Now it’s clear that the recent “record warm” 2 years had little to do with CO2, and instead were almost entirely due to the well-known El-Nino phenomenon over the past two years.

And now that the recent El Nino has disappeared, temperatures globally are in a free fall and back at levels of the previous decade and indications show a further  drop.

The ENSO now in cool phase

Unfortunately even that enhanced layer of CO2 we have in the atmosphere was not able to trap any of the recent heat. The 20-year pause remains pretty much intact, and will be extended as the El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) hovers near the cooling La Nina territory.

Note that it will take the cooler equatorial Pacific surface temperatures a few months to make there way into the lower tropospheric satellite data. Don’t be surprised if this year we see a repeat of 1999.

Last El Nino not really warmer than 1998

Dr. Roy Spencer here wrote that 2016 will in fact NOT be statistically warmer of any significance compared to 1998.

According to global warming theory, the earth is supposed to warm some 2.0 to 4.5°C by 2100, which means 0.2 – 0.45°C per decade. So shouldn’t the recent El Nino have warmed the globe some 0.4 to 0.8°C more than 1998? Not even close, as the speedometer below shows! For hardcore warmists, it is increasingly becoming a huge challenge to explain the glaring lack of warming so far this century.

Read rest…

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (12)

  • Avatar

    old44

    |

    See, their policies on reducing global warming are working, who said a tax on fuel was pointless.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    GUY MOOSBURGER

    |

    I wonder if you can add CO2 to airtight windows and heat buildings for free using the heat trapping abilities and direct sunlight of this super duper trace gas?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Bill Butler

      |

      It would only help if Global Warming Deniers were inside and forced to inhale high concentrations of carbon dioxide. High Carbon Dioxide concentrations can kill you.
      .
      “An eruption of lethal gas from Lake Nyos in Cameroon kills nearly 2,000 people and wipes out four villages on this day in 1986. Carbon dioxide, though ubiquitous in Earth’s atmosphere, can be deadly in large quantities, as was evident in this disaster.” http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/gas-cloud-kills-cameroon-villagers
      .
      As for contemporary concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere; over 150 years ago, John Tyndall discovered that carbon dioxide absorbs long wavelength “heat radiation”. (This is the driving mechanism of Global Warming) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Tyndall#/media/File:TyndallsSetupForMeasuringRadiantHeatAbsorptionByGases_annotated.jpg
      .
      How long will it take for Global Warming Deniers to understand something that scientists knew 150 years ago?

      Reply

      • Avatar

        GUY MOOSBURGER

        |

        Of course there has to be a case where you can determine nature climate warming from man-made co2 warming before making a statement like ‘This is driving mechanism of Global Warming.’. Since there isnt any evidence and probably impossible to determine why are you so sure? Oh right this is your way of expressing for your disillusions. My brother-in-law uses Chem-Trail Conspiracies. I guess it better than the believing in fake moon landing.

        Reply

      • Avatar

        amirlach

        |

        Trouble is, Co2 alone does not “absorb” enough heat to cause any alarming amount of warming. This is why the Co2 Socialists dreamed up the Positive Water Vapor Feedback, which has been programed into all of the models.

        The “theory” is that rising Co2 will cause a rise in water vapor in the atmosphere. And everyone knows that Water Vapor is the dominant “greenhouse” gas.

        This positive feedback simply does not exist in the real world and in fact water vapor has declined in contradiction to the failed Man Made Global Warming Hypothesis.
        “An analysis of NASA satellite data shows that water vapor, the most important greenhouse gas, has declined in the upper atmosphere causing a cooling effect that is 16 times greater than the warming effect from man-made greenhouse gas emissions during the period 1990 to 2001.” https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/06/nasa-satellite-data-shows-a-decline-in-water-vapor/

        When the Model results were compared to reality they all failed. This is the Missing Hot Spot. “The ‘Hotspot’ is crucial to the climate debate. http://joannenova.com.au/2008/10/the-missing-hotspot/

        If greenhouses gases are warming the planet that warming will happen first in the cold blob of air 8-12 km above the tropics. It’s freezing cold up there, but it ought to be slightly less freezing cold thanks to greenhouse gases. All 20-odd climate models predict warming there first—it’s the fingerprint of greenhouse gas warming, as opposed to warming by some other cause, like solar magnetic effects, volcanic eruptions, solar irradiance, or ozone depletion etc etc.”

        There is only one denier here Bill. You. Stop denying the scientific method, which clearly states, that when your prediction is wrong, your “theory” is wrong.

        ““The lack of a tropical upper tropospheric hotspot in the observations is the main reason for the disconnect in the above plots, and as I have been pointing out this is probably rooted in differences in water vapor feedback. The models exhibit strongly positive water vapor feedback, which ends up causing a strong upper tropospheric warming response (the “hot spot”), while the observation’s lack of a hot spot would be consistent with little water vapor feedback.” — Roy Spencer

        Hundreds of millions of dollars that have gone into the expensive climate modelling enterprise has all but destroyed governmental funding of research into natural sources of climate change. For years the modelers have maintained that there is no such thing as natural climate change…yet they now, ironically, have to invoke natural climate forces to explain why surface warming has essentially stopped in the last 15 years! — Roy Spencer” http://joannenova.com.au/2013/06/even-with-the-best-models-warmest-decades-most-co2-models-are-proven-failures/

        Reply

      • Avatar

        Raj

        |

        Bill Thanks for the great information and special Thank you for admin sharing this incredible post with us.

        Reply

      • Avatar

        Gator

        |

        How long will it take for Global Warming Deniers to understand something that scientists knew 150 years ago?

        How long will it take for Bill to understand that scientists still have not refuted natural variability as the cause of recent, or any global climate changes?

        And Bill, high oxygen levels are also lethal.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_toxicity#Society_and_culture

        Nice strawman.

        Reply

      • Avatar

        JayPee

        |

        Cut the pseudonym crap, sonny.
        You are andrzejewski,
        in all your ignorant, arrogant, lying glory.

        Reply

  • Avatar

    bollywood songs lyrics

    |

    Thanks for sharing a helpful information.I appreciate everything you have added to my knowledge base.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      JayPee

      |

      Well

      How about if you share your knowledge base ?

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Peter

    |

    This actually answered my problem, thank you!

    Reply

Leave a comment

No Trackbacks.