Hillary Loves Fracking, But Only In Other Countries

hillaryNewly released emails show Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton attempted to bring fracking — something she opposes — to other countries while working in the Obama administration.

The Intercept published emails showing how Department of State officials worked closely with private sector oil and gas companies to lobby the White House to commit resources to promoting fracking. Former Secretary of State Clinton’s State Department secured technical assistance with the geologic science of finding shale reserves and helping partner nations find investment for new fracking projects. It helped advise world leaders on the benefits of fracking, connected them with American energy experts, and organized visits to drilling sites in America to make it a role model for fracking around the world.

These emails suggest Clinton made promoting fracking for natural gas abroad a major priority during her tenure, once stating “the United States will promote the use of shale gas.” Fast forward to the 2016 presidential election and she’s totally flip-flopped on the issue, promising to virtually ban fracking if elected president.

“Hillary is now anti-fracking partially due to political motives which are totally contradictory. The presence of Bernie Sanders and the increase in zealotry among far-left Democrats has made fracking a core issue,” Kathleen White, senior fellow at the Texas Policy Foundation and co-author of a new book on energy policy, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Sanders has pulled Hillary to a much more extreme point of view on fracking. It isn’t unusual for politicians to adjust what they say on the basis of who is listening, but this is taking that to the next level.”

“Now, I know that in some places it’s controversial,” Clinton said in 2010. “But natural gas is the cleanest fossil fuel available for power generation today, and a number of countries in the Americas may have shale gas resources. If developed, shale gas could make an important contribution to our region’s energy supply, just as it does now for the United States.”

The State Department hosted several conferences on fracking in other countries during Clinton’s tenure, and sent U.S. experts to help foreign officials develop fracking programs. State’s fracking program continued under Secretary of State John Kerry, and is known as the Unconventional Gas Technical Engagement Program.

In 2012, Clinton instructed all U.S. embassies to “pursue more outreach to private sector energy partners.” Many of these partners provided financial support to her political campaigns. Clinton’s campaign even hired a former TransCanada lobbyist, the company behind the Keystone XL pipeline, as a consultant.

Clinton’s emails reveal she influenced energy policy in Mexico as secretary of state, and pushed for fracking before she resigned in 2013. A redacted email reveals Clinton hired David Goldwyn as “State Department International Energy Coordinator/Diplomat-At-Large.” Goldwyn eventually became the head of the State Department’s Bureau of Energy Resources, where he helped Clinton “sell fracking to the world” specifically citing the enormous environmental benefits.

“Under the Obama administration, energy policy has been absolutely incoherent,” White said. “If elected President, Hillary would likely be forced to continue Obama’s energy policies for purely political reasons, even if she is secretly supportive of fracking. It would be hard for her not to given the role Sanders far more extreme policies have played in the campaign.”

Read rest…

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (1)

  • Avatar



    Consistencies in the Clinton position on energy ? She claims to be willing to eliminate coal jobs ,coal companies and shut down fossil fuels . Ok let’s say she was capable of doing as she claims . The question is why is she running for President and proposing to shut down the USA economy ?

    Let’s see the personal E mails and maybe the truth will reveal itself . Promoting fracking in foreign countries yet saying she ,if elected ,will “shut down fossil fuels ” ?

    To be realistic she is not going to shut down anything that would lead to the complete implosion of the USA economy which is well on it’s way without her comments .

    $$Billions in non-recoverable grants and loan guarantees to some of the biggest
    Eco-Titanic’s in history should be enough tax payer abuse . Misguided charity to “renewable ” companies is that part of her plan to ?

    Time to get real . To bad if her hedge fund backers wet their pants and stamp their feet .


Leave a comment

Loading Disqus Comments ...

No Trackbacks.