Has the EPA Declared War on America?

gina wh eventAs a general rule, I am not a big believer in conspiracy theories; but I may be changing my mind when it comes to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Environmental activists have long had a strong arm and a bias against agriculture even before the agency was established.Just think back to Rachel Carson and what she did to the chemical industry with her unscientific claims about DDT that have since been proven wrong.But this regulatory agency, which has been given free reign by the Obama White House, has declared war on more than just American farmers.

The latest salvo from the EPA aimed at farmers came this past week when it released its latest evaluation of atrazine. Not surprisingly EPA said atrazine is dangerous and, ignoring some of its own research, is marching toward a ban on one of the most popular and cost effective weed control technologies used by farmers today. Besides being unscientific, the move toward banning atrazine will lead to farmers having to use more chemicals to control weeds, many of which have more environmental impact than atrazine. The EPA also continues to drag its feet on the approval of dicamba products, which farmers really need now to control the spread of resistant weeds.

While the fight over atrazine is not new and will likely end up in court with farm organizations suing the EPA just like they have done over WOTUS and RFS, we should not feel alone. Agriculture is just one of dozens of U.S. industries that are under attack by the EPA. The coal, electric, air conditioning, and auto industries are just a few of the sectors the agency is attempting to change in significant ways.

The agency has proposed (and been supported by the President) a plan that would cripple the production of electricity from coal. Power companies would have to either greatly increase the cost of electric power or shut down coal-fired plants. Yet, at the same time, nuclear power plants are also being shut down because of government regulations and the lack of a coherent energy policy. So, I guess you had better start stocking up on candles.

Read rest…

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (2)

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    Any government organization that pays lobbyist’s who have their own agenda and are in a conflict of interest needs to be disbanded. What remains of some remaining services needs to be very narrowly defined with no end rounds elected lawmakers .
    Which companies have benefitted from EPA grants and then done or been asked to participate in EPA regulation drafting ?

    Who runs the internal audit department and what have they done to curb HR
    deficiencies and to provide proper oversight of millions of dollars in grants each year ?

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    The brown suit is fitting . Why does a government department give lobbyist’s grant money ? Does the Justice Department pay lobbyist’s to draft laws that favor the lobbyist agenda ?

    Questions of the EPA’s conduct have not even started .

    Reply

Leave a comment

No Trackbacks.