Gov. Walker to Obama: Clean Power Plan is ‘riddled with inaccuracies’

Scott WalkerGov. Scott WalkerThe AP reported Thursday that presidential hopeful Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) told President Obama in a letter that his Clean Power Plan is simply “unworkable” and “riddled with inaccuracies.” The letter, obtained by the AP and dated May 21, said Wisconsin would not comply with the president’s plan without “significant and meaningful changes.” The Clean Power Plan is designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions that the EPA says is responsible for climate change.

A defiant Walker wrote that the proposed rule for coal-fired power plants made “questionable assumptions,” making it untenable for his state. He also wrote that adherence to the new rules would cost Wisconsin nearly $13.4 billion, raise electricity rates by 29 percent, and that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had overstated its authority by “attempting to regulate the entire electric generating system.”

Wisconsin is one of a dozen “coal-reliant states suing the EPA to block the so-called Clean Power Plan,” the AP reported. The plan requires all states to “cut carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 30 percent by 2030.” These states, which rely heavily on coal for its electricity, believe the new rules are onerous, unreachable, cost-prohibitive, and will essentially kill the coal industry. The states also say the plan “oversteps EPA’s authority and violates the Clean Air Act.”

In March, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell reiterated this point when he wrote to all governors to challenge the proposed rules to cut CO2 emissions, which he described as “illegal” and a “job-killer.” McConnell’s letter accuses the EPA with “attempting to compel states to do more themselves than what the agency would be authorized to do on its own.”

And in Oklahoma, Gov. Mary Fallin (R) signed an executive order in April preventing the state from formulating a state plan based on the upcoming federal rules. Fallin also called the upcoming rules an “overreach and directed the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality not to work on any state plans in response to the rules.”

According to the Times Record, Fallin’s executive order says that “development of such a SIP (state implementation plan) involves dozens of state and private entities and thousands of hours of study and negotiations. It is a massive undertaking and requires the commitment of untold amounts of financial and time resources.”

But the EPA still has a few tricks up its sleeve for recalcitrant governors that refuse to cooperate. If the states don’t come up with a plan for complying with the Clean Power Plan (CPP), the EPA can legally impose a federal plan on those states. If the EPA wins the legal hurdles it’s facing from industry and states alike, utility companies will have “no other options but to comply with a federal plan.” Oklahoma, like many other states, have laws that allow “regulated utilities to pass on any compliance costs to ratepayers for federal environmental regulations.”

A group of Democratic Senators also sent a disingenuous letter to all governors urging them to “comply with the EPA rule” while stating that “McConnell’s home state is already drafting a compliance plan.” Except McConnell’s home state of Kentucky is not creating a state compliance plan, but has instead “passed a bill to exempt the state from submitting a plan to meet the proposed air regulations that work against coal.” That’s according to The Olympian, which also reports the state is also suing the EPA over the rule.

And because upgrading aging coal-fired plants is too expensive, shutting them down and replacing them with natural gas-powered plants has allowed Kentucky to ‘inadvertently’ reach the low-emissions target set by the EPA’s draft rules. According to one compliance tool, “the state will be over-complying by 2.6 million tons of carbon,” even though “92 percent of its electricity comes from coal-fired power plants.”

However, if the EPA’s final rule differs drastically from the draft rule’s emission targets, or the EPA capriciously decides that closing down coal-fired power plants can’t be counted as “real carbon dioxide emission reductions,” this strategy could force utilities to become even more energy efficient with the costs being passed on to consumers. The upcoming gubernatorial election in November also complicates the matter as both the Democratic and Republican nominees have said they won’t allow Kentucky to “submit a plan to the EPA.”

Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, South Carolina, West Virginia, and Wyoming are challenging the EPA’s CPP in court and filed a joint motion to expedite a court review of their lawsuit. By forcing states to create implementation plans before the courts can decide on their legality, having these plans in place may “grant legitimacy to the CPP to the court.” The EPA’s final rule will be released in late summer, normally the hottest time of year for the United States.

Source

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (10)

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    The EPA dictatorship needs to be culled. Then start putting the interests of the country ahead of the eco Marxist regime currently trying to undermine the USA economy through regulatory overreach .

    Shipping jobs out of the country does nothing but move the source of some emissions somewhere else (likely with less responsible emission control), displacing American workers and raising energy prices .

    The USA government needs to ask itself who’s job it is to look after the broader public interest rather than hand off it’s responsibility to an agency with one agenda based on an enormous scam .

    Reply

    • Avatar

      Al Shelton

      |

      I agree, but I cannot see much happening wrt the EPA until Obummer is gone and a new administration is in under a Republican Pres.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    JayPee

    |

    Let’s say the plain truth and nothing but:

    Hosanna O’bama”s so-called ” Clean Energy plan ” is a flat out LIE and nothing but.

    Why half-heartedly attack the LYING MARXIST ISLAMIC pig ?

    Expose him for what he is. To hell with the msm response. They’re going to lie anyway !

    Reply

  • Avatar

    MikeW

    |

    I wish we had a governor like Scott Walker here in Michigan.

    Reply

    • Avatar

      John from Michigan

      |

      Amen to that!!! It’s starting to look like we’ve got a RINO here.

      Reply

      • Avatar

        Me

        |

        Really, look at Detroit and say the same.

        Reply

        • Avatar

          Me

          |

          But then again who is the RINO you’re speaking of?

          Reply

  • Avatar

    GR82DRV

    |

    In Obama’s own words:
    [i]“Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. . . . Because I’m capping greenhouse gases, coal power plants, natural gas—you name it—whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”[/i]
    He plans to implement that policy especially hard here in Wisconsin where we rely overwhelmingly on clean coal. Unless he also has a plan to force the top 1% to pay the regulatory bills of others (which he would do given enough time), the [b]average citizen[/b] in Wisconsin [i]will [/i]see their energy cost of living skyrocket – only to pay homage to a fraudulent hypothesis that has declared CO2 to be a pollutant.

    I’ve noticed that oxygen causes rust, and rust degrades our infrastructure… Can we have [b][i]oxygen[/i][/b] declared as a pollutant too?

    Reply

    • Avatar

      JayPee

      |

      Your quotation of the Lord G-d Hosanna O’bama the magnificent is :

      One of the few statements he ever made that was not completely a lie.

      Reply

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    Well on a positive note if the EPA exerts it’s regulatory tentacle’s over population control they can save taxpayers by keeping the same initials .

    The EPA doesn’t take responsibility for the economy but the current administration sanctions their effort to increase energy costs thus putting at risk the people Obama likes to claim are his .

    Unfortunately he won’t be held accountable for the direction and leash his party has given the EPA .

    Let’s see how well Hillary handles that
    political pollution .
    Unnecessary headwinds unless you were planning on making money off the scam .

    Reply

Leave a comment

Loading Disqus Comments ...

No Trackbacks.