Global Warming: Some Sunlight

sunWe got a lot of grief for our recent post mocking the latest global warming conspiracy theory (which holds that eating meat is bad for the environment).

It isn’t … but try telling that to the bureaucratic enviro-Nazis desperate to keep the “climate change” ruse going at all costs.  Actually … on second thought … don’t try telling them that.  As we’ve noted previously, you can’t argue with supporters of global warming because all they see – everywhere, in everything – is validation of their theory.

Hot summer?  Global warming.  Cold winter?  Global warming.  Cool summer?  Global warming.  Mild winter?  Yeah … you’re getting it.

Anyway …

We recently stumbled on some information that we think puts this debate in its proper context.  According to a post from analyst Paul Dorian of Vencore Weather, a big driver of global temperatures is … hold the phone … the sun.

“Solar activity has been very low and one measure of solar activity – its X-ray output – has basically flatlined in recent days,” Dorian wrote last week.

He’s even got a nifty chart from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) showing this flatline …

sun chart

Hmmmm …

The sun is currently in what’s called Solar Cycle 24.  Every eleven years or so, there will be a peak (or a few peaks) in sun spot formation – which are huge magnetic storms on the sun’s surface that spew “mass coronal ejections” of hot gasses into space.

And while these “mass coronal ejections” are 93 million miles away from earth, they play a significant role in determining how hot or cold it gets on our planet.

Solar Cycle 24?  It kicked off back in January 2008 and experienced its first peak in 2013.  But the sunspot activity associated with the current “Solar Maximum” is nowhere near as intense as the Solar Cycle that preceded it.

In fact, here’s a chart from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) showing the difference …

cycle

“Not since cycle 14 peaked in February 1906 has there been a solar cycle with fewer sunspots,” Dorian wrote.  “We are currently more than six years into Solar Cycle 24 and today the sun is virtually spotless despite the fact that we are still in what is considered to be its solar maximum phase.”

Interesting, huh?

Ready for the kicker?

“It is safe to say that weak solar activity for a prolonged period of time can have a negative impact on global temperatures in the troposphere which is the bottom-most layer of Earth’s atmosphere – and where we all live,” Dorian continued.  “There have been two notable historical periods with decades-long episodes of low solar activity. The first period is known as the ‘Maunder Minimum,’ named after the solar astronomer Edward Maunder, and it lasted from around 1645 to 1715.  The second one is referred to as the ‘Dalton Minimum,’ named for the English meteorologist John Dalton, and it lasted from about 1790 to 1830.  Both of these historical periods coincided with below-normal global temperatures in an era now referred to by many as the ‘Little Ice Age.’”

The takeaway?  There are bigger things impacting the earth’s temperature than man-made pollution.  Much bigger things.

“Global warming boosters have this unbounded hubris that it is humans who control nature, and that human activity can terminally despoil the planet as well as cause its salvation,” Southwestern Law School professor Joerg Knipprath wrote back in 2009 (before the latest Solar Cycle).

Read rest…

Trackback from your site.

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    StuartL

    |

    Grain and vegetable farming decreases soil carbon by 50% due to drainage and tilling even more if they burn the stubble.
    Properly managed free range cattle farming puts back the carbon into the soil, prairies and grasslands have deep rich fertile soil with a large carbon content.
    soil contains three time the carbon than the atmosphere does.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    sonnyhill

    |

    [quote name=”StuartL”]Grain and vegetable farming decreases soil carbon by 50% due to drainage and tilling even more if they burn the stubble.
    Properly managed free range cattle farming puts back the carbon into the soil, prairies and grasslands have deep rich fertile soil with a large carbon content.
    soil contains three time the carbon than the atmosphere does.[/quote]Organic farming will not feed the world. It is OK by me is people want to pay extra for “organically grown” or “ethically raised” food. Let the market decide. Farm organizations pursued credits for carbon sequestration years ago and were turned down.

    Reply

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    So I am sure some genius out there has calculated the relative climate impact of naturally occurring variation in sunspots vs that of increases in CO2 ?

    Also, if temperature were to be measurably increased as a result of human generated CO2 what is the elasticity of fossil fuel use as the planet warms .

    If it is mainly related to population growth then how many people would have to disappear and where .

    If the greenie promoters advocate stopping big oil how many people are the greenies condemning to death ?

    Is that the plan but they just don’t have the balls to say so ?

    Big oil pays a lot of bills ..What government services would be toast without those great big oil gas cheques rolling in ?

    The whole scam is about keeping the cash flowing for greenie groups and a few other maggots along for the ride .

    If not we should be seeing a lot more cave dwellers and I don’t see any other than the ones in Africa using cow poo as fuel
    for their latte machines .

    If politicians were actually looking after the public interest they would tell the scary global warming promoters the party is over take off .

    Reply

Leave a comment

No Trackbacks.