‘Global warming’ in Texas a farce

noaaAfter pushing forwards its “climate change” propaganda full force, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is being accused of fraud.

RealClimateScience.com, which refers to itself as “The Deplorable Climate Science Blog,” maintains that Texas has been cooling since 1895, but this observation reportedly “doesn’t suit NOAA’s global warming agenda.”

Using animation, the blog illustrates the fact that the NOAA keeps manipulating and cooling down the past temperatures of the Lone Star State further and further to create the appearance of a warming trend.OneNewsNow sought comment from Dr. Pat Michaels of the Cato Institute’s Center for the Study of Science on the matter.

“There are a bunch of adjustments that are done to the raw data, and one of them is called a time of day adjustment,” says Michaels, who is the former president of the American Association of State Climatologists. “It turns out ‚Äì when you measure the temperature ‚Äì if you’re just taking the high and the low for the day, [it] has some influence on the record, [and] that’s probably what most of the adjustment is.”

Meanwhile, Michaels asserts that he cannot recall having seen a larger series of adjustments on statewide temperature record as he has seen in Texas.

“Those are really big adjustments, and I think people are kind of skeptical about that,” the climatology expert shared.

Michaels also explains that NOAA’s temperature data is almost always altered.

“What you see when you see a graph of the temperature since 1895 ‚Äì and they began their temperature records around 1895 ‚Äì what you see is substantially different than the raw data … particularly in the early years,” Michaels asserts. “That’s the good news, but the weird news is that almost always, it seems that each successive alteration of a temperature record results in it either being cooler in the early years … or warmer in the later years.”

Michaels says that this simply means that there is more of a warming trend put into the data virtually every time the data is modified.

“The fact of the matter is, people have been somewhat suspicious of these adjustments, particularly last summer, when NOAA put out a new global temperature record that attempted to get rid of the so-called pause — meaning the fact that we really can’t see any statistically significant warming in surface records from 1997 through about 2014 or so,” Michaels contends. “They made some claims when they did that that really weren’t normative science.”

Read rest…

Comments (2)

  • Avatar



    Who made NOAA the world’s thermometer ? Did all the other countries throw in the towel and just sit around and wait for NOAA to tell them how much they have played with raw data ?
    The “records ” cover a period of less than 150 years of the earth’s 4 billion year existence . That is not even a representative sample period in any scientific study
    and we do know it has been much warmer and much colder . Even if fossil fuels lasted a thousand years their effect isn’t even going to register as a blip on a blip at .00000025 of climate history . Besides warming while it lasts is good not bad as the climate fear industry likes to promote their business .

  • Avatar



    “It would appear that the temperature rise profile claimed by the adjusted data is largely if not entirely an artefact arising from the adjustments applied (as shown in Figure 3), not from the experimental data record. In fact, the raw data does not in any way support the AGW theory. ”


Comments are closed