EU Won’t Reach Its Carbon Goals, It’s Just Another Climate Hypocrite

mugabeZimbabwe tyrant Robert MugabeTo great fanfare and self-congratulation, the European Union signed on to the Paris climate treaty in December. But it won’t be able to keep its promise. Yes, the entire enterprise is a sham.

The British Guardian reported this week that the “EU is set to emit 2 billion tons more CO2 than it promised at the Paris climate talks,  threatening an agreement to cap global warming at 2C.” Unsurprisingly, “lawmakers say that the shortfall could spur criticism from other countries that signed up to the Paris agreement, which aims for net zero emissions later this century.”

As noted by The American Interest, “the EU was perhaps the most vociferous in its attempt to try and hammer out an international climate treaty.” But as it turns out, it has nothing — its leaders are just another bunch of climate hypocrites who are convinced that if they can act as if they are defending the climate, others will believe in their moral superiority.

Neither the Paris talks nor any other United Nations global warming conference is actually intended to save the planet from devastating climate change. Those behind the climate scare know that their goals are unreachable and are aware that not only have the dire predictions failed to transpire, the reality is that it hasn’t warmed in almost two decades.

But the climate meetings and the yowling about carbon dioxide emissions continue. Why?

Simply put, the global warming alarmist community wants to reorganize the world economy by weakening developed nations that became economically strong through primarily capitalist economic systems. The benefits these nations have worked to accrue are to be handed to nations that have not earned them. Zimbabwe tyrant Robert Mugabe has rushed to the front of the line, demanding that the U.N. send him $1.5 billion a year to feed his people, because, he says, they have grown hungry due to global warming. That’s the shakedown in progress.

The U.N.’s top global warming official, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, has even admitted this. A year ago, she said “this is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.”

Read rest…

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (3)

  • Avatar



    ” Cap global warming at 2C “. Really ? That was a jump the shark moment which just shreds the Mickey Mouse credibility of the global warming fraud squad .
    What nut jobs ever believed someone was going to manage the earth temperature within 2 C ? So if the change occurred from the overwhelming effect of natural variables, such as sun spot activity that ,would be just fine or would they like to try and con the public they can control that too .

    Is there a bigger joke of a newspaper than the Guardian ?
    This scam is over .

  • Avatar

    David Lewis


    This articles talks about one of the hidden agendas of the anthropological climate change movement, that of transferring wealth from the nations that have earned it to those who haven’t. There are many other agendas. I personally believe Obama’s agenda is to use climate change to significantly increase the power of the federal government.

    The fact that controlling warming isn’t the real goal explains three different things that would otherwise be a mystery.

    About ten years ago there was a proposal called “Methane First.” Methane is a much stronger green house gas than carbon dioxide. The proposal was to concentrate on methane emissions first and then carbon dioxide later. That would give time for technology to develop to reduce emissions. If harmful anthropological climate change were real, it would have made sense. However, it was ignored; I’m sure because it didn’t support the hidden agendas.

    About the same period of time, again assuming there was a warming problem, there was a proposal to block some solar emissions by releasing certain sulfur chemicals into the upper atmosphere. This was met with immediately hostility saying we don’t know what the impact could be in other ways. So where the alarmists were claiming to know for certain that apocalyptic warming was going to happen, but rejected a solution because of unknown effect. Again, the main reason was this solution didn’t support their agendas.

    As time goes on there is a greater gap between the average UN IPCC climate model and observed data. The alarmist should view this as great news meaning that less emission reductions are needed. Instead, they are hiding or ignoring that gap. They can’t agree that fewer reductions in emissions are needed because those reductions support their agenda.

    These mysteries are cleared up by knowing what the real goals of the warming alarmist are.

  • Avatar



    Another corrupt tyrant pig who expects to be paid for mere existence by countries that should feel guilty of providently taking care of their populace, which s something that he has not only never done but has deliberately starved his people.

    Of course, every leftist pig will extol his righteousness.

    But of course, if he can be used as an excuse for carbon taxes, we can forgive his

    CRIMES against HUMANITY.

Comments are closed

No Trackbacks.