Does Fracking Increase Or Decrease Global Warming? The Report Environmentalists Don’t Want To Read

frackingEnvironmentalists like to claim that fracking accelerates global warming, but that’s likely not the case, according to numbers crunched in a report published Monday by the pro-industry group Energy In Depth (EID).

Environmental claims that America’s hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, boom accelerated global warming due to methane emissions were just blown away, according to a report published Monday by the pro-industry group Energy In Depth (EID).

The report, which cited 75 scientific studies and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), concluded that methane emissions are declining in both absolute terms and per unit of gas produced, despite an enormous increase in the amount of gas produced. Methane emissions matter because they cause 25 times more global warming per unit of gas than carbon dioxide (CO2) over a time period of 100 years, according to the EPA. Regardless, the report finds their emissions to have decreased, which does not bode well for anti-fracking campaigns.

The new gas production has caused America to transition to clean burning natural gas-fired power plants, which emit far less CO2 than conventional coal power, leading to a 12 percent decline in greenhouse gas emissions since 2005.

The Sierra Club and other environmental groups assert that the environmental advantages of fracking are negated by increased methane emissions, but this claim isn’t supported by science.

The 75 scientific studies EID cites were published over the last 5 years by the firm ICF International. These studies found that methane emissions from the natural gas industry are sharply falling, even though production of natural gas has spiked. Absolute methane emissions from natural gas fell by 15 percent between 1990 and 2014, and emissions per unit of natural gas produced dropped by 43 percent over the same period.

Even the EPA has noted that rising natural gas use is responsible for falling greenhouse gas emissions, saying in an April report “a decrease in the carbon intensity of fuels consumed to generate electricity has occurred due to … increased natural gas consumption and other generation sources.”

Read rest…

Comments (2)

  • Avatar

    David Lewis


    Remember that the anthropological climate change movement is not driven by science or logic, but rather hidden agendas. In the case of fracking, it makes natural gas much cheaper. This makes it even more difficult to develop the most expensive forms of energy, solar and wind.

    It makes no difference to them that natural gas, due to its relative low carbon intensity compared other fossil fuels, has significantly decreased the green house gas output of the U.S.

  • Avatar



    The best answer to the headline question is:

    “[b]I don’t accept the premise[/b] that man-generated CO2 has any appreciable effect on our climate.”

    On the other hand, natural gas is certainly a cleaner burning fuel than many of the alternatives. Fracking not only contributes to cleaner emissions, it offers true energy independence to the United States, a benefit that solves a myriad of other problems.

    Leftists oppose natural gas production precisely because it [u]does[/u] make our economy stronger and our security greater.

Comments are closed