Climate Mafia: Bringing The Atmosphere Into Compliance

First, they came for the surface temperatures, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a thermometer.

Then they came for the weather balloons, and I did not speak out—  Because I was not a balloon.

Then they came for the satellites, and I did not speak out—  Because I was not a satellite.

Then they came for science—and there were no honest scientists left to speak.

The 1995 IPCC report showed no net warming of the troposphere from 1958 to 1995.

ipcc_sar_wg_I_full_report.pdf

NOAA/NASA didn’t like the fact that Earth wasn’t warming very much, so they simply changed the surface data, and doubled warming.

GISS2001_2015

2001 version : Fig.A.ps
2015 version: Fig.A.gif 

Then NOAA had a problem that the surface data didn’t match the radiosonde data and that the radiosonde data showed a global warming hiatus, so they altered the radiosonde temperatures to bring them in compliance with the fake surface temperatures.

2012 Version   2017 Version

Government scientists had successfully corrupted the surface and radiosonde temperatures, but they still had a huge problem with the satellite data which they didn’t control.

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

But not to worry – the climate mafia went to work on Carl Mears at RSS, and got him to corrupt his satellite data to bring it in compliance with the already corrupted surface and radiosonde data. This is hot off the press from the Guardian. After the latest data tampering, RSS satellite temperatures are now warming faster than surface temperatures.

Conservatives are again denying the very existence of global warming | Dana Nuccitelli | Environment | The Guardian

The global warming scam is a criminal venture. It has nothing to do with climate or science. Data is constantly being corrupted to meet the needs of the climate mafia.

Read more at Real Climate Science

Comments (3)

  • Avatar

    Spurwing Plover

    |

    Dose that wacko James Hansen still work for NASA? and what ever became of that GAIA nutcase James Lovelock anyway?

  • Avatar

    rakooi

    |

    ” 06:26 AM on 11 July, 2017
    It’s certainly false for DENIERS or SKEPTICS to claim everything or most things are adjusted up. The following link is a good explanation of why temperature adjustments (corrections)  are made.

    I tracked this down to figure out whats going on.

    theconversation.com/why-scientists-adjust-temperature-records-and-how-you-can-too-36825

    It’s the raw data thats “unreliable” to some extent
    (although not hugely).
    Urban heat islands bias things up,
    stations are moved, often biasing things down,
    thermometers sometimes break,
    or are old and less reliable, etc. T
    These are corrected, and are easy enough to quantify.

    It  would be crazy not to correct for these issues.
    The following link shows raw and adjusted data for global land, ocean and land ocean combined temperatures.
    variable-variability.blogspot.co.nz/2015/02/homogenization-adjustments-reduce-global-warming.html 

    Land temperatures are adjusted up slightly, but ocean temperatures are adjusted down, and combined land ocean temperatures are adjusted down!
    This is the most important and complete data set.  
    This  seems lost on the SKEPTICS & denialists. 
    Although there are several RINGING defenses of Scientific Adjustments by NOTED SKEPTIC DR. Judith Curry, for example.

    • Avatar

      Sonnyhill

      |

      Sorry, RAGOUT, I’m skeptical when Al Gore’s disciples make the “adjustments” . Somehow impending doom is the bottom line

Comments are closed