Analysis: Global Temperature Record Is A Smoking Gun Of Collusion And Fraud

(h/t Climate Depot) NASA temperature data doesn’t even agree with NASA temperature data from 15 years ago.

2016-01-12-06-41-10

2016 version : Fig.A.gif 2001 version : Fig.A.ps

NASA has altered their own data by 0.5C since 2001, yet claims that everyone agrees within about 0.05C.

2016-01-10-10-51-29.png

The Japan Meteorological Agency has altered their own data by a similar amount. In 1975 they showed no net warming in the Northern Hemisphere from 1900 to 1970.

Screenshot 2016-04-08 at 05.24.44 AM-down

understandingcli00unit.pdf

But the story gets much worse. Phil Jones from CRU said that much of the Southern Hemisphere data is “mostly made up.”

2015-12-20-09-20-56

2729.txt

In 1978, experts said there was no end in sight to the 30 year cooling trend, and that data from the southern hemisphere was too meager to be reliable.

Screenshot 2016-04-08 at 06.21.59 AM-down

TimesMachine: January 5, 1978 – NYTimes.com

The 1990 IPCC report showed that there is insufficient data over much of the earth to determine temperature anomalies.

Screenshot 2016-04-08 at 06.08.29 AM-down

ipcc_far_wg_I_chapter_07.pdf

All of the agencies in the NASA graph at top use the same NOAA GHCN data for most of their database, and that data has 80% loss of stations over the past 30 years.

all-raw-station-count-ghcn

The only reliable long term data is from the US (which shows no warming in the raw temperature data over the past 80 years) and a few other isolated locations.

Screenshot 2016-04-08 at 06.44.39 AM

Long Record GHCN Analysis « the Air Vent

NASA has massively altered their US temperature data since 1999, to make a 1930-2000 cooling trend disappear.

GISS_US_1999-2016

The published NOAA US temperature graph doesn’t even vaguely resemble their own underlying data.

2015-12-18-12-36-03

The claimed agreement in temperature data is simply not legitimate. The people involved know that their data is inadequate, tampered and largely made up. They all use basically the same GHCN data set from NOAA (which has lost more than 80% of their stations over the past few decades) and E-mails show that they discussed with each other ways to alter the data to make it agree with their theory.

email from wigley to phil jones

http://di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

Source

Leave a comment (newest first):

Comments (2)

  • Avatar

    Amber

    |

    $$Trillions spent on a fabricated scare, such is the global warming cult . Some in the scientific community with encouragement from political forces , grant seekers and other
    green activist groups have fueled one of the biggest frauds in history . Banks and even a few religious leaders trying to restore the public trust are late bandwagon arrivals.

    Who has been responsible for NASA temperature records and who “made up ”
    the SH data ?

    Why didn’t politicians demand to see verifiable data before buying this scam hook line and sinker ? Other than wanting to use the fear factor , “the earth has a fever ” to justify a massive tax grab and to dole out pork to their lobbyist donors ,it allowed politicians a chance to strut around looking so green .

    Yes by all means AG’s start a lawsuit against “deniers “, but be warned there is more than enough evidence to make you and the scary global warming cult look fools. More importantly the discovery evidence will allow the guns to be turned and the criminals promoting the scam
    revealed .

    The global warming cult has done more to harm the environment than any other human factor .

  • Avatar

    GR82DRV

    |

    Perhaps more striking than the fraud itself is just how “unscientific” the narrative is when revealed. Talk about shooting from the hip! These people make wild a– guessing look sophisticated!

    Is this the best trillions of taxpayer dollars can buy?

Comments are closed

No Trackbacks.